Peter Bayle is severe on certain historical inaccuracies of Davila, and it is true that Davila must be read with due remembrance of the fact that he was not only a Catholic but the especial protege of Catherine de' Medici, but it is not to be forgotten that Bayle was as strongly Protestant.
The Hebrew text of the book of Ezekiel is not in good condition - it is full of scribal inaccuracies and additions.
In spite of all its inaccuracies and exaggerations the book served a useful purpose in reviving the self-respect of a despondent people.
After May, 1889, I find almost no inaccuracies, except some evident slips of the pencil.
All liability of Finneys howsoever arising for any such inaccuracies or errors is expressly excluded to the fullest extend permitted by law.
How would you define inaccuracies? Add your definition here.