Agora Forums
 
   
1 of 4
1
Technology vs. Language.
Posted: 14 July 2009 12:49 PM   [ Ignore ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  10322
Joined  2008-04-02

Rolling up a car window
buying some artist’s latest album
shift key on keyboard actually shifting something
turning on a TV and turning channels without actually ‘turning anything”.

 Signature 

.........please draw me a sheep…......

Profile
 
 
Posted: 14 July 2009 12:50 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  10322
Joined  2008-04-02

OK
I summarized your last post.
I wish there were some way to change the heading without posting a new topic.
GOG"S There is a task for you all.

 Signature 

.........please draw me a sheep…......

Profile
 
 
Posted: 14 July 2009 12:50 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  10322
Joined  2008-04-02

Rolling up a car window.  I still roll up my car windows. So that one is valid.  Comment??

 Signature 

.........please draw me a sheep…......

Profile
 
 
Posted: 15 July 2009 12:05 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  7418
Joined  2007-08-21

Technology vs. Language

Here’s what I actually said on another thread, which sparked an interesting idea:

It’s funny how language tends to change more slowly than the technology that creates it.

We still talk about rolling up the car window, buying some artist’s new album, and so on. The tab key on a typewriter used to move the carriage to real tabs, the shift key actually shifted something, and most people still turn on the TV, then proceed to turn it to different channels without ever turning anything.

Good idea for a new thread: Language versus Technology.

I’m sure there are other words and phrases that would not make sense without the memory of some technology to back them up.

For example, why do we cut and paste on a computer?
What is a leading edge?
Why is Times New Roman called Times New Roman?

All of these have histories that make the terms make sense.

I’m sure there are many more. Can you answer the ones above? And can you provide other examples?

 Signature 

Ars longa, vita brevis

Profile
 
 
Posted: 15 July 2009 03:00 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 4 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  10322
Joined  2008-04-02

Who Me?
I opened it up, just because you decided to repeat it all.
Times New Roman, comes from Mussolini and the pizza place he opened on Times Squre.
Leading Edge from people putting up new guttering on old houses.
Cut and Paste is a computer term and I don’t understand them.

 Signature 

.........please draw me a sheep…......

Profile
 
 
Posted: 15 July 2009 05:19 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 5 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  7418
Joined  2007-08-21

I expanded on your explanation because I thought you were a little terse. (I think everyone is a little terse.)

Times New Roman is a serif typeface commissioned by the British newspaper, The [London] Times, in 1931. Times New Roman is slightly condensed (without being noticaeably so), thereby enabling more type to fit in on the page.

The leading edge is the front edge of an airplane wing, the part of the paper that goes into the press first, the front part of a cutting blade, etc.

Cut and paste comes from typesetting and printing. For ads and the like, photos and type were produced separately, then cut and pasted (with warm wax) onto a larger sheet of paper. When everything was laid out and “camera ready.” the finished product was photographed, and the film was used to make plates for printing.

 Signature 

Ars longa, vita brevis

Profile
 
 
Posted: 16 July 2009 09:00 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 6 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  10322
Joined  2008-04-02

Is a “little terse” the opposite of “greatly verbose”?\
As for serfiTimesNewRoman, who cares?
As for leading edge, Paul, your buddy says life is a two edged sword. Where is the leading edge.
Warm wax is for removing hair where it is not wanted.

 Signature 

.........please draw me a sheep…......

Profile
 
 
Posted: 16 July 2009 10:19 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 7 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  7418
Joined  2007-08-21

sick

 Signature 

Ars longa, vita brevis

Profile
 
 
Posted: 16 July 2009 01:41 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 8 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  10322
Joined  2008-04-02

You said it!

 Signature 

.........please draw me a sheep…......

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 October 2009 05:43 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 9 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  7418
Joined  2007-08-21

Watch you language and do not advertise.

 Signature 

Ars longa, vita brevis

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 October 2009 08:35 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 10 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  10322
Joined  2008-04-02

You have been reported for spam, pornography and vulgarity.

 Signature 

.........please draw me a sheep…......

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 October 2009 11:46 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 11 ]
Newbie
Avatar
Rank
Total Posts:  29
Joined  2009-10-14

[It’s funny how language tends to change more slowly than the technology that creates it.

It’s rather about language users, I think. It’s much more convinient to use old, known words (like net,web, copy or cell) then learn new ones. I’m not a specialist, but I’m sure they have their own specialized language - once three computer scientists talked in(?) my presence about new programme and I didn’t understand any word.
  But I have another question: I used to learn English over 20 years ago and had memorized words: “refridgerator”, “bicycle”. Then I had a long break and I have returned to learning few years ago and I found “fridge” and “bike”. My question is: are the words shortened or have I got better dictionaries?

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 October 2009 01:57 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 12 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  7418
Joined  2007-08-21

It’s rather about language users, I think. It’s much more convenient to use old, known words (like net,web, copy or cell) than learn new ones.

I think it is not so much a matter of learning new terms, but of borrowing terms that make sense in a new environment. Network was around before there were computer networks, as were mouse, monitor, etc. But all these terms gave the computer world a sense of familiarity to new users who would have been more confused otherwise.

“Fridge” and “bike” have been around a long, long time. Maybe you just didn’t see them when you looked in your dictionary before.

 Signature 

Ars longa, vita brevis

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 October 2009 02:46 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 13 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  10322
Joined  2008-04-02

“Fridge” and “bike” are older than me and I got off the boat with Noah, Saparris, on the other hand is more knowledgeable since he is the person who coined the word “dirt”.

 Signature 

.........please draw me a sheep…......

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 October 2009 03:58 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 14 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  7418
Joined  2007-08-21

Short for dirt bag. (There were no words when I was young. We had to point and grunt.)

 Signature 

Ars longa, vita brevis

Profile
 
 
Posted: 24 October 2009 07:22 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 15 ]
Newbie
Avatar
Rank
Total Posts:  29
Joined  2009-10-14

It’s all very, very fascinating and thanks to you I am learning new words and new history. And who of you is the author of pictures in Lascaux?

Profile
 
 
   
1 of 4
1