Technology vs. Language
Here’s what I actually said on another thread, which sparked an interesting idea:
It’s funny how language tends to change more slowly than the technology that creates it.
We still talk about rolling up the car window, buying some artist’s new album, and so on. The tab key on a typewriter used to move the carriage to real tabs, the shift key actually shifted something, and most people still turn on the TV, then proceed to turn it to different channels without ever turning anything.
Good idea for a new thread: Language versus Technology.
I’m sure there are other words and phrases that would not make sense without the memory of some technology to back them up.
For example, why do we cut and paste on a computer?
What is a leading edge?
Why is Times New Roman called Times New Roman?
All of these have histories that make the terms make sense.
I’m sure there are many more. Can you answer the ones above? And can you provide other examples?