It sounds like two things are going on:
1. Frank is carrying on the well-established tradition of American politicians misusing the language or making ridiculous grammatical errors
2. The effect of his statement may be to sensationalize the issue a bit. Whether or not he’s aware of it, the words ‘war going on’ in that order are more powerful than if he rearranged them to suit conventions of grammar.
I wouldn’t be surprised if he knew exactly what he was doing by arranging the words so, nor would I be if he was oblivious. I don’t want to pass judgment on Frank when I don’t know what else he said or anything about him, but nevertheless it’s not loquacious intellectual statements that the American public responds to anymore. It’s those short little phrases called ‘sound bytes.’
It IS something to bemoan, because it speaks of the superficiality bred of consumerism. We glance at a person and know who they are by the logo on their t-shirt; we judge products in stores by their packaging and books by their covers. Even here, in the Agora, we are allowed a little picture and a few words to define ourselves, and from that our fellows can derive a sense of identity. Just an example! Don’t freak out, anyone, because obviously we’re into more than ‘sound bytes’ of conversation here.
It makes perfect sense for American politicians to use phrases akin to corporate logos to transmit a political idea or event on to the people. It’s an exercising of the indirect hegemonic power of people in such authoritative positions. We’re set up by our own consumerist society to react to just the sort of language Frank used.
If I was a conspiracy theorist, I would cerrtainly guess that his ulterior motive was to get people to think that the Iraq situation is "finally" escalating to a war (nevermind war-like events in the region for the last several years) and now we’d better worry about it, and explains the dramatic increase in gas prices…. All to the benefit, ultimately, of the oil companies, who probably give him a LOT of money to protect their interests. But, I am NOT a conspiracy theorist, so I didn’t say that (it was the devil’s advocate).
In reality I don’t know what he said this morning; I guess I"m just airing my opinions on the direction communication in general seems to be going in America, and it frustrates me when I see evidence of consumer culture permeating every aspect of life.
I better get off the ol’ soap-box.
inanna