Agora Forums
 
   
 
Each’s
Posted: 26 October 2005 12:25 PM   [ Ignore ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  179
Joined  2003-08-16

A friend of mine asked me whether or not "each’s" is a word.  I had said no, but wasn’t quite sure of how to explain it.  What is the correct answer and explanation?

- Robby
(absent for a long time but now hopefully much more active)

 Signature 

“¡Entrégate por entero!” - Rafael Arévalo Martínez

Profile
 
 
Posted: 26 October 2005 01:04 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  586
Joined  2005-05-03

It’s a word, in English.  Same as one’s. Any noun or pronoun can receive a contraction, if by ‘s you mean is. If you mean possessive case, each’s own, it’s dialect and doesn’t go over in most of the English speaking world. In America it sounds cockney to say the least.

 Signature 

Inside of a dog, it’s too dark to read.—Groucho Marx.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 26 October 2005 11:53 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  3773
Joined  2002-08-01

Welcome back, Rob!  I agree with Melissa and don’t have anything else to say, just wanted to say welcome back!

-Tim

 Signature 

For myself, I find I become less cynical rather than more… and realize that men’s hearts are not often as bad as their acts, and very seldom as bad as their words. - JRR Tolkien

Profile
 
 
Posted: 27 October 2005 04:21 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  3773
Joined  2002-08-01

LOL… Thanks, Katy.  I’m on lunch break. wink

-Tim

 Signature 

For myself, I find I become less cynical rather than more… and realize that men’s hearts are not often as bad as their acts, and very seldom as bad as their words. - JRR Tolkien

Profile
 
 
Posted: 27 October 2005 05:53 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 4 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  664
Joined  2005-09-17

To each’s own.

VB

 Signature 

E quindi uscimmo a riveder le stelle.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 27 October 2005 10:21 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 5 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  545
Joined  2005-06-26

but surely the expression is "to each HIS own", and therefore it’s not a contraction at all.

I can’t think of any way you could contract a word after "each" to make a genuine contraction, nor can I think of an instance of using "each" with a possessive ‘s.

You wouldn’t say, for example, "they each went back to each’s home", you’d say "they each went back to their own home"

"They took each other’s dogs to the beach.", and not "they took each’s dog to the beach.".

I admit I could simply be missing a case where it could be used properly, but I’d have to stand firmly on the side of "each’s" not being a proper construct, either as a contraction or a possessive.

Azh

 Signature 

“Cogito ergo ... uh, quid sequitur?”

Profile
 
 
Posted: 28 October 2005 12:16 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 6 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  664
Joined  2005-09-17

Ah, az, you missed the pun. But I still like you (fascinated).

VB

 Signature 

E quindi uscimmo a riveder le stelle.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 28 October 2005 09:34 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 7 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  545
Joined  2005-06-26

[quote author=VB link=board=grammar;num=1130376357;start=0#7 date=10/28/05 at 09:16:43]Ah, az, you missed the pun. But I still like you (fascinated).

I didn’t miss the attempt at humour - but I wouldn’t call it a pun. A pun is meant to be a play on words, not a repetition of the original phrase without a change in inflection or meaning.

Call me obtuse if you like, or abstruse if you must, but surely even an attempted pun requires some minimal amount of humour.

Azh

 Signature 

“Cogito ergo ... uh, quid sequitur?”

Profile
 
 
Posted: 28 October 2005 09:59 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 8 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  664
Joined  2005-09-17

sorry

 Signature 

E quindi uscimmo a riveder le stelle.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 28 October 2005 11:56 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 9 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1138
Joined  2004-04-02

Well, Azh, I thought "to each’s own" was pretty funnry, myself. For my penance I will read something turgid and high-brow.  :)
gailr

 Signature 

“Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job.”—Douglas Adams

Profile
 
 
Posted: 28 October 2005 11:58 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 10 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  664
Joined  2005-09-17

Thanks gailr.  ;)

Let me know if anything comes up.

V

 Signature 

E quindi uscimmo a riveder le stelle.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 08 November 2009 01:55 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 11 ]
Newbie
Rank
Total Posts:  1
Joined  2009-11-08

Ok, I’m a student currently taking honours English and I’m writing an essay on cultural context. I was writing when I came across the word each’s in the sentence “...compare the restrictions imposed on the characters by each’s respective society”. Now to me it just doesnt sound right.. I’m just wondering if it is proper grammar, or if I should substitute it with something else. Any help?

Profile
 
 
Posted: 08 November 2009 05:54 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 12 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  10239
Joined  2008-04-02

I would say:  “by the respective society to which each belongs.”  (or something similar)  It may sound stilted, but you are in Honors English, and so to use it is a boon. (Don’t end the sentence with a
preposition.)

Profile
 
 
Posted: 09 November 2009 12:16 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 13 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  845
Joined  2009-05-04

Ignore this

Profile
 
 
Posted: 09 November 2009 09:15 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 14 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  10239
Joined  2008-04-02

I don’t think so Eddie, I am using it to return a thread to the forum after three advertisements on this forum entry.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 09 November 2009 07:50 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 15 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  7382
Joined  2007-08-21

Each’s is just bad English.

 Signature 

Ars longa, vita brevis

Profile
 
 
   
 
 
‹‹ bad vs badly      Disorientated ››